From owner-freebsd-isdn Wed Jun 14 13:49:37 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-isdn@freebsd.org Received: from alice.turbocat.de (gate.turbocat.de [212.41.163.6]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 37C7A37B664 for ; Wed, 14 Jun 2000 13:49:33 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dave@turbocat.de) Received: from cat.turbocat.de (cat.turbocat.de [212.41.163.194]) by alice.turbocat.de (8.10.1/8.10.1/07072000/dw/1) with ESMTP id e5EKnVP01693; Wed, 14 Jun 2000 22:49:31 +0200 (CEST) Received: (from dave@localhost) by cat.turbocat.de (8.8.5/8.7.3) id WAA00914; Wed, 14 Jun 2000 22:49:32 +0200 (MET DST) Message-Id: <200006142049.WAA00914@cat.turbocat.de> Content-Type: text/plain MIME-Version: 1.0 (NeXT Mail 4.2mach v148) In-Reply-To: <200006142025.WAA38231@peedub.muc.de> X-Nextstep-Mailer: Mail 4.0 (Enhance 2.0b4) Received: by NeXT.Mailer (1.148) From: David Wetzel Date: Wed, 14 Jun 2000 22:49:31 +0200 To: Gary Jennejohn Subject: Re: reject Cc: "Leif Neland" , freebsd-isdn@FreeBSD.ORG References: <200006142025.WAA38231@peedub.muc.de> Sender: owner-freebsd-isdn@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org > From: Gary Jennejohn > Wait a second. If you have 2 devices on an S0 bus responding to the > same number then I would expect a race condition to result. It doesn't > seem reasonable to me to expect isdnd to reject calls for other devices > on the bus. In fact, I would suspect that it would violate some standard. > IMHO that's a function which a PBX should carry out. No. i4b/the anwering machine should answer the call and hang up. --- _ _ _(_)(_)_ David Wetzel, Turbocat's Development, (_) __ (_) Buchhorster Strasse 23, D-16567 Muehlenbeck/Berlin, FRG, _/ \_ Fax +49 33056 82835 NeXTmail dave@turbocat.de (______) http://www.turbocat.de/ DEVELOPMENT * CONSULTING * ADMINISTRATION To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isdn" in the body of the message