Date: Mon, 17 Feb 1997 16:43:45 +0800 From: Peter Wemm <peter@spinner.DIALix.COM> To: obrien@NUXI.com (David O'Brien) Cc: bde@zeta.org.au (Bruce Evans), pst@shockwave.com, cvs-all@freefall.freebsd.org, CVS-committers@freefall.freebsd.org, cvs-ports@freefall.freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/contrib/gcc/config/i386 freebsd-elf.h freebsd.h Message-ID: <199702170843.QAA01048@spinner.DIALix.COM> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sun, 16 Feb 1997 23:42:16 PST." <19970216234216.PB64256@dragon.nuxi.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
David O'Brien wrote: [..] > > There is no better way. Define in in bsd.port.mk so at least the makefiles > > don't need it. > > That may not be a bad idea. > I'm guessing I would meet with resistance to also add this to > /etc/make.conf ? /etc/make.conf and bsd.port.mk are only used by the port wrapper makefiles. /etc/make.conf and bsd.port.mk are totally ignored by 99.99% of vendor Makefiles. You can't have bsd.port.mk pass things like 'CFLAGS=... -D__FreeBSD__' to all the real makefiles because many will break as they build CFLAGS from other definitions, and some don't even use CFLAGS at all. Cheers, -Peter
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199702170843.QAA01048>