From owner-freebsd-small Thu Sep 7 16:37:50 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-small@freebsd.org Received: from c014.sfo.cp.net (c014-h022.c014.sfo.cp.net [209.228.12.86]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2405A37B42C for ; Thu, 7 Sep 2000 16:37:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: (cpmta 17468 invoked from network); 7 Sep 2000 16:37:47 -0700 Received: from nohost080.encommerce.com (HELO wscatoneil.flashcom.net) (166.90.168.80) by smtp.flashcom.net (209.228.12.86) with SMTP; 7 Sep 2000 16:37:47 -0700 X-Sent: 7 Sep 2000 23:37:47 GMT Message-Id: <4.3.2.7.2.20000907163729.00e0a510@mail.flashcom.net> X-Sender: bwana@mail.flashcom.net X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 4.3.2 Date: Thu, 07 Sep 2000 16:40:48 -0700 To: freebsd-small@freebsd.org From: Tim O'Neil Subject: Re: PicoBSD build request In-Reply-To: <20000907233617.A46922@mithrandr.moria.org> References: <4.3.2.7.2.20000907094231.00e09ab0@mail.flashcom.net> <4.3.2.7.2.20000907070627.00b18270@mail.flashcom.net> <200009071418.QAA28992@info.iet.unipi.it> <4.3.2.7.2.20000907094231.00e09ab0@mail.flashcom.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Sender: owner-freebsd-small@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG At 02:36 PM 9/7/00, you wrote: >You were doing NAT? Was it natd or the kernel complaining? I suspect >natd. It just means the translated packet didn't pass the firewall >rules. Uh... NO. The problem existed even with a blank rule file. Like I said initially, I played with the thing for some time. I didn't plug in the kernel values, watch it fail, and then throw up my hands. I played with my config for weeks before deciding to move on. It definitely had some thing to do with my ISP and stuff I simply had no control over. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-small" in the body of the message