From owner-freebsd-stable Wed Aug 23 9:55:32 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from odin.ac.hmc.edu (Odin.AC.HMC.Edu [134.173.32.75]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E15A37B42C for ; Wed, 23 Aug 2000 09:55:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from brdavis@localhost) by odin.ac.hmc.edu (8.11.0/8.11.0) id e7NGtL914602; Wed, 23 Aug 2000 09:55:21 -0700 Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2000 09:55:21 -0700 From: Brooks Davis To: Rich Wales Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: 4.1-STABLE kernel with 4.1-RELEASE userland? Message-ID: <20000823095521.A13699@Odin.AC.HMC.Edu> References: <200008231415723.richw@wyattearp.stanford.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2i In-Reply-To: <200008231415723.richw@wyattearp.stanford.edu>; from richw@webcom.com on Wed, Aug 23, 2000 at 08:27:59AM -0700 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Wed, Aug 23, 2000 at 08:27:59AM -0700, Rich Wales wrote: > Does this sound like expected behavior? I would have thought that > a 4.1-STABLE kernel (and modules) would still be compatible with the > 4.1-RELEASE userland binaries; is this not the case? Did I do some- > thing obviously wrong here? It's not exactly expected behavior, but you are in an unsupported configuration. It's expected that thing's won't work right with an out of sync userland and kernel. Sometimes you get luckey and sometimes you don't. -- Brooks -- Any statement of the form "X is the one, true Y" is FALSE. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message