From nobody Sun Jan 5 05:45:10 2025 X-Original-To: freebsd-current@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4YQmVg61Hsz5kP0R for ; Sun, 05 Jan 2025 05:45:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dclarke@blastwave.org) Received: from mail.oetec.com (mail.oetec.com [108.160.241.186]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature ECDSA (P-256) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mail.oetec.com", Issuer "E5" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4YQmVg1Hmbz45S3 for ; Sun, 5 Jan 2025 05:45:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dclarke@blastwave.org) Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=blastwave.org header.s=default header.b="non/pvxC"; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of dclarke@blastwave.org designates 108.160.241.186 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=dclarke@blastwave.org; dmarc=pass (policy=quarantine) header.from=blastwave.org Received: from [172.16.35.3] (pool-99-253-118-250.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com [99.253.118.250]) (authenticated bits=0) by mail.oetec.com (8.17.1/8.17.1) with ESMTPSA id 5055jAUJ017998 (version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128 verify=NOT) for ; Sun, 5 Jan 2025 00:45:11 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from dclarke@blastwave.org) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=blastwave.org; s=default; t=1736055912; bh=b4xYUWuudfrTJocv9WsBJNL9HsSf7MDsDUEZ3nUd66A=; h=Date:To:From:Subject; b=non/pvxCuutEEDNFcJE6HgC/9MgusKtcglIfQSW39dpv0FFaBD05B5uB3951aaM6i p96miG7V6dPIiNnzZP0Olc/pkbp82+bwxOpxiMsAKhAju/7sgTvDwsICmNp6WjWBpK 9sBP/Tnt1L7cPgLd/LDPDdl9VZlpq3wzUXnj7A8SK4Jr1T76kKx5ZKzKKRxYMt9Cmd vKTeYk7COVSHwoL/Z+I3ml+UbWFr3UNc5eSQn9eKPyi28Qy4ZqRFyCE/CT1imt73+s Hk+UA0g6IeZD4g9beHpfu1VQa1Cm60OoKvrXZP7OqR5PAKWUfIvxk0LwaEQczAupXt cbOhrHUKdINYw== Message-ID: <36c212cc-0da9-43b7-b760-d29d71bc35e5@blastwave.org> Date: Sun, 5 Jan 2025 00:45:10 -0500 List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-current List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird To: Current FreeBSD Content-Language: en-CA From: Dennis Clarke Subject: Is there any way to nudge security/libfido2? It blocks chunks of KDE Organization: GENUNIX Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-oetec-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-oetec-MailScanner-ID: 5055jAUJ017998 X-oetec-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-oetec-MailScanner-From: dclarke@blastwave.org X-Spam-Status: No X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4YQmVg1Hmbz45S3 X-Spamd-Bar: ---- X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.69 / 15.00]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-1.00)[-1.000]; RCVD_DKIM_ARC_DNSWL_MED(-0.50)[]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[blastwave.org,quarantine]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED(-0.20)[108.160.241.186:from]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+mx]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[blastwave.org:s=default]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; XM_UA_NO_VERSION(0.01)[]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; HAS_ORG_HEADER(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[blastwave.org:+]; RCVD_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-current@freebsd.org]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; MLMMJ_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-current@freebsd.org]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:812, ipnet:108.160.240.0/20, country:CA]; SUBJECT_HAS_QUESTION(0.00)[] It seems to have been a while since I was able to run a poudriere bulk build and get KDE available. At least on 15-CURRENT. There is a little brick in the path called security/libfido2 : https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=283697 commit 74ecdf86d8d2a94a4bfcf094a2e21b4747e4907f resulted in the appropriate declarations for the correct versions of _POSIX_C_SOURCE via __POSIX_VISIBLE and then we get error: call to undeclared function 'ppoll'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit function declarations [-Werror,-Wimplicit-function-declaration] Sort of annoying as even 14.2-RELEASE on amd64 and ports 2024Q4 fails : [142amd64-2024Q4] [2025-01-04_10h11m35s] [committing] Queued: 5 Built: 4 Failed: 1 Skipped: 0 Ignored: 0 Fetched: 0 Tobuild: 0 Time: 00:04:44 The 15.0-CURRENT is much much worse : [150amd64-latest] [2025-01-04_08h12m11s] [committing] Queued: 365 Built: 323 Failed: 2 Skipped: 40 Ignored: 0 Fetched: 0 Tobuild: 0 Time: 01:52:01 In any case ... is there a way to nudge that ? -- -- Dennis Clarke RISC-V/SPARC/PPC/ARM/CISC UNIX and Linux spoken