From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG  Fri Sep 17 10:03:52 2010
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B2AE106564A
	for <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>; Fri, 17 Sep 2010 10:03:52 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from avg@icyb.net.ua)
Received: from citadel.icyb.net.ua (citadel.icyb.net.ua [212.40.38.140])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B0DF78FC0C
	for <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>; Fri, 17 Sep 2010 10:03:51 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from porto.topspin.kiev.ua (porto-e.starpoint.kiev.ua
	[212.40.38.100])
	by citadel.icyb.net.ua (8.8.8p3/ICyb-2.3exp) with ESMTP id NAA20286;
	Fri, 17 Sep 2010 13:03:47 +0300 (EEST)
	(envelope-from avg@icyb.net.ua)
Received: from localhost.topspin.kiev.ua ([127.0.0.1])
	by porto.topspin.kiev.ua with esmtp (Exim 4.34 (FreeBSD))
	id 1OwXnG-0008J5-RJ; Fri, 17 Sep 2010 13:03:46 +0300
Message-ID: <4C933D02.7010106@icyb.net.ua>
Date: Fri, 17 Sep 2010 13:03:46 +0300
From: Andriy Gapon <avg@icyb.net.ua>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD amd64; en-US;
	rv:1.9.2.9) Gecko/20100912 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.3
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Steven Hartland <killing@multiplay.co.uk>
References: <4C926418.2050407@gmail.com>
	<4C9328B9.4010100@gmail.com><20100917085621.GA48570@icarus.home.lan><4C933284.6050601@icyb.net.ua>
	<20100917094212.GA49319@icarus.home.lan>
	<9E658CE404644DC0B609789C0A1098DE@multiplay.co.uk>
In-Reply-To: <9E658CE404644DC0B609789C0A1098DE@multiplay.co.uk>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.2
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, Jeremy Chadwick <freebsd@jdc.parodius.com>
Subject: Re: Fwd: Tomcat6 port keeps locking up??
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD <freebsd-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Sep 2010 10:03:52 -0000

on 17/09/2010 12:49 Steven Hartland said the following:
> 
> My experience is no this is no longer the case at least on stable + patches
> mentioned on thread:-
> "zfs very poor performance compared to ufs due to lack of cache?"

And at least one of those is a patch to prevent ZFS from giving memory too eagerly.

-- 
Andriy Gapon