From owner-freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 11 00:48:37 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: doc@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 577DF97F; Mon, 11 May 2015 00:48:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail0.glenbarber.us (mail0.glenbarber.us [IPv6:2607:fc50:1:2300:1001:1001:1001:face]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mail0.glenbarber.us", Issuer "Gandi Standard SSL CA 2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2BB641101; Mon, 11 May 2015 00:48:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.10.9.105] (75.97.147.233.res-cmts.sewb.ptd.net [75.97.147.233]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) (Authenticated sender: gjb) by mail0.glenbarber.us (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id BE6FC13330; Mon, 11 May 2015 00:48:34 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.9.2 mail0.glenbarber.us BE6FC13330 Authentication-Results: mail0.glenbarber.us; dkim=none reason="no signature"; dkim-adsp=none User-Agent: K-9 Mail for Android In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Subject: Re: doc/release removal? From: Glen Barber Date: Mon, 11 May 2015 00:48:32 +0000 To: Eitan Adler , FreeBSD Release Engineering Team , FreeBSD Documentation Engineering Team , FBSD Doc project Message-ID: X-BeenThere: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Documentation project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 May 2015 00:48:37 -0000 On May 10, 2015 8:19:35 PM EDT, Eitan Adler wrote: >On 5 May 2015 at 09:20, Eitan Adler wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> doc/release/Makefile has many references to cvs checkouts. In >> addition doc/release/texts/ only has a README which references >> non-existent directories. Is there any reason not to `svn rm >> doc/release`? > >Unless anyone objects I plan on removing this directory soon. I can >not see how it is useful to any recent process. Don't, until you get an explicit OK from doceng. Glen -- Sent from my phone. Please excuse my brevity and/or typos.