From owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 2 15:41:13 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7684E16A4BF for ; Tue, 2 Sep 2003 15:41:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2FE2243FE3 for ; Tue, 2 Sep 2003 15:40:28 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (gnats@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h82MeHUp058964 for ; Tue, 2 Sep 2003 15:40:17 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.12.9/8.12.9/Submit) id h82MeHIf058963; Tue, 2 Sep 2003 15:40:17 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 2 Sep 2003 15:40:17 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <200309022240.h82MeHIf058963@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org From: "Kevin Oberman" Subject: Re: kern/55395:ICH sampling rate changes after resume from suspend X-BeenThere: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Kevin Oberman List-Id: Bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Sep 2003 22:41:13 -0000 The following reply was made to PR kern/55395; it has been noted by GNATS. From: "Kevin Oberman" To: Orion Hodson Cc: freebsd-gnats-submit@freebsd.org Subject: Re: kern/55395:ICH sampling rate changes after resume from suspend Date: Tue, 02 Sep 2003 15:33:01 -0700 > From: Orion Hodson > Date: Mon, 01 Sep 2003 21:58:06 -0700 > Sender: hodson@icir.org > > This is a multipart MIME message. > > --==_Exmh_-18846300150 > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii > > /-- "Kevin Oberman" wrote: > | A bit more information: > | > | Modifying hw.snd.ac97rate makes not difference at all. I measured the > | speed-up as about 10% or the equivalent of 52.3 KHz. > > Ah, okay, it's coming back up and using the wrong clock source. We've had a > general issue with this on the ICH. This is probably a function of how the > existing ich code effects resets, though don't have an ich box that manifests > the problem to verify this first hand. Can you try the attached patch and see > if it improves the situation? Thanks for the patch, but it results in a kernel that fails during the device probe. It fires off multiple panics and I can't seem to get anything useful to work at the db> prompt, just another panic. Let me know if you would like the detials of the panic and I'll transcribe them for you. The patch was to a freshly cvsuped sources as of about 14:30 PDT (-7) today. I'm still running installworld after backing out the patch. I'll build another kernel with the patch for debugging once I feel that the CURRENT is otherwise "stable". Thanks again! -- R. Kevin Oberman, Network Engineer Energy Sciences Network (ESnet) Ernest O. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (Berkeley Lab) E-mail: oberman@es.net Phone: +1 510 486-8634