From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 31 14:31:46 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC834106566C for ; Tue, 31 Jan 2012 14:31:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from martin@dc.cis.okstate.edu) Received: from x.it.okstate.edu (x.it.okstate.edu [139.78.2.13]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10A2F8FC16 for ; Tue, 31 Jan 2012 14:31:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dc.cis.okstate.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by x.it.okstate.edu (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q0VDt1SE016695 for ; Tue, 31 Jan 2012 07:55:02 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from martin@dc.cis.okstate.edu) Message-Id: <201201311355.q0VDt1SE016695@x.it.okstate.edu> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2012 07:55:01 -0600 From: Martin McCormick Subject: freebsd-update; What did I do? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2012 14:31:46 -0000 I started to run freebsd-update to upgrade a 8.x system to 9.0-RELEASE # freebsd-update -r 9.0-RELEASE upgrade Looking up update.FreeBSD.org mirrors... 4 mirrors found. Fetching metadata signature for 8.2-RELEASE from update5.FreeBSD.org... done. Fetching metadata index... done. Inspecting system... done. The following components of FreeBSD seem to be installed: kernel/generic src/base src/bin src/cddl src/contrib src/crypto src/etc src/games src/gnu src/include src/krb5 src/lib src/libexec src/release src/rescue src/sbin src/secure src/share src/sys src/tools src/ubin src/usbin world/base world/dict world/doc world/info world/manpages world/proflibs The following components of FreeBSD do not seem to be installed: world/catpages world/games world/lib32 Does this look reasonable (y/n)? yes Fetching metadata signature for 9.0-RELEASE from update5.FreeBSD.org... done. Fetching metadata index... done. The update metadata is correctly signed, but failed an integrity check. Cowardly refusing to proceed any further. # What is the next step, here? Thank you.