Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 28 Jan 2000 10:27:29 -0800 (PST)
From:      John Polstra <jdp@polstra.com>
To:        davidc@guild.ab.ca
Cc:        hackers@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: java -> ld-elf.so.1: assert failed: ... lockdflt.c:55
Message-ID:  <200001281827.KAA05467@vashon.polstra.com>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0001271831060.73216-100000@lodge.guild.ab.ca>
References:  <Pine.BSF.4.21.0001271831060.73216-100000@lodge.guild.ab.ca>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In article <Pine.BSF.4.21.0001271831060.73216-100000@lodge.guild.ab.ca>,
Chad David  <davidc@guild.ab.ca> wrote:
> 
> Since the ~Jan 25 I have been getting an error while
> running any java programs on 3.4-stable.  I cvsup'd,and 
> ran a make world this afternoon and it still fails. It doesn't
> always hit... about 50% of the time.
> 
> The errors is:
> 
> ld-elf.so.1: assert failed: /usr/src/libexec/rtld-elf/lockdflt.c:55
[...]
> FreeBSD stronghold.guild.ab.ca 3.4-STABLE FreeBSD 3.4-STABLE #0: Thu Jan
> 27 17:04:43 MST 2000

I believe I fixed this one in -current 3 days ago, but I haven't
merged it into -stable yet.  I would appreciate it if you would try
the patch below and let me know whether it clears up the problem for
you.

John

Index: lockdflt.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /home/ncvs/src/libexec/rtld-elf/lockdflt.c,v
retrieving revision 1.3.2.1
diff -u -r1.3.2.1 lockdflt.c
--- lockdflt.c	2000/01/21 02:31:50	1.3.2.1
+++ lockdflt.c	2000/01/28 18:25:01
@@ -28,10 +28,9 @@
 /*
  * Default thread locking implementation for the dynamic linker.  It
  * is used until the client registers a different implementation with
- * dllockinit().  The default implementation does mutual exclusion
- * by blocking the SIGVTALRM, SIGPROF, and SIGALRM signals.  This is
- * based on the observation that most userland thread packages use one
- * of these signals to support preemption.
+ * dllockinit().  The default implementation does mutual exclusion by
+ * blocking almost all signals.  This is based on the observation that
+ * most userland thread packages use signals to support preemption.
  */
 
 #include <dlfcn.h>
@@ -63,10 +62,13 @@
 
     l = NEW(LockDflt);
     l->depth = 0;
-    sigemptyset(&l->lock_mask);
-    sigaddset(&l->lock_mask, SIGVTALRM);
-    sigaddset(&l->lock_mask, SIGPROF);
-    sigaddset(&l->lock_mask, SIGALRM);
+    sigfillset(&l->lock_mask);
+    sigdelset(&l->lock_mask, SIGTRAP);
+    sigdelset(&l->lock_mask, SIGABRT);
+    sigdelset(&l->lock_mask, SIGBUS);
+    sigdelset(&l->lock_mask, SIGSEGV);
+    sigdelset(&l->lock_mask, SIGKILL);
+    sigdelset(&l->lock_mask, SIGSTOP);
     return l;
 }
 


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200001281827.KAA05467>