From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Oct 27 20:32:55 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 979C716A41F for ; Thu, 27 Oct 2005 20:32:55 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from fehwalker@gmail.com) Received: from xproxy.gmail.com (xproxy.gmail.com [66.249.82.205]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3332743D45 for ; Thu, 27 Oct 2005 20:32:55 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from fehwalker@gmail.com) Received: by xproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id t8so52120wxc for ; Thu, 27 Oct 2005 13:32:54 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=RKVI8TScoN36yo7eWJp/x4O4YihAYtgncBk/KHlGwehL+RdhC3l+u/Q2ht8vt+qaElrqrslB44vOlnAGQ+wRUN09cFbSqXh2X5DtF0mviBceZjywsmaejYVfJ3VATz9sv+AFR5913C31tuMZ9piiGJytkA6o+Fc3zAJC8IB5Aco= Received: by 10.65.222.2 with SMTP id z2mr1958303qbq; Thu, 27 Oct 2005 13:32:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.65.154.7 with HTTP; Thu, 27 Oct 2005 13:32:54 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <35de0c300510271332n463caea8o7b0124fb37125702@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2005 16:32:54 -0400 From: Bryan Fullerton To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <200510270540.30073.patfbsds@davenulle.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <200510260046.j9Q0khYU004317@app.auscert.org.au> <200510270540.30073.patfbsds@davenulle.org> Subject: Re: 6.0 RC1 usbd.conf (and installation comments) X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2005 20:32:55 -0000 On 10/26/05, Patrick Lamaizi=E8re wrote: > Yes but be carefull, by sample amavisd-new uses scripts in /etc/rc.d and = not > in /usr/local/etc/rc.d. "Why the mail server does not work anymore ?" Yes, this is most annoying. I haven't gotten around to submitting a ports PR complaining about /etc/rc.d/amavisd -- it's so obvious I figured it must have been intentional, but I can't figure out how it makes sense organizationally for a port to drop things in /etc/rc.d. Bryan