From owner-freebsd-hackers  Wed Aug  6 05:47:32 1997
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-hackers>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id FAA22010
          for hackers-outgoing; Wed, 6 Aug 1997 05:47:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gatekeeper.itribe.net (gatekeeper.itribe.net [209.49.144.254])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id FAA22005
          for <hackers@freebsd.org>; Wed, 6 Aug 1997 05:47:30 -0700 (PDT)
Message-Id: <199708061244.IAA24112@gatekeeper.itribe.net>
Received: forwarded by SMTP 1.5.2.
Date: Wed, 6 Aug 1997 08:49:13 -0400 (EDT)
From: Jamie Bowden <jamie@itribe.net>
To: David Holloway <daveh@tamis.com>
cc: hackers@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Status of USB, TX chipset, PIIX3, etc. 
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.3.91.970805185153.5878C-100000@sage>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

On Tue, 5 Aug 1997, David Holloway wrote:

> I see USB as another good way to 
> get around the ever present "not enough irqs" problem

Damn, I was hoping for an intelligent bus design that gave each bus
interface it's own dedicated data channel, like high end workstations
have.

Jamie Bowden

System Administrator, iTRiBE.net