From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Apr 15 16:05:41 2003
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD87B37B401
	for <current@freebsd.org>; Tue, 15 Apr 2003 16:05:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from srv1.cosmo-project.de (srv1.cosmo-project.de [213.83.6.106])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8ADDF43F3F
	for <current@freebsd.org>; Tue, 15 Apr 2003 16:05:40 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from ticso@cicely9.cicely.de)
Received: from cicely5.cicely.de (cicely5.cicely.de
	[IPv6:3ffe:400:8d0:301:200:92ff:fe9b:20e7])
	by srv1.cosmo-project.de (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h3FN5Jcx085289
	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=OK);
	Wed, 16 Apr 2003 01:05:21 +0200 (CEST)
	(envelope-from ticso@cicely9.cicely.de)
Received: from cicely9.cicely.de (cicely9.cicely.de
	[IPv6:3ffe:400:8d0:301:210:5aff:fe30:1c1a])
	by cicely5.cicely.de (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h3FN5HYi055368
	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO);
	Wed, 16 Apr 2003 01:05:18 +0200 (CEST)
	(envelope-from ticso@cicely9.cicely.de)
Received: from cicely9.cicely.de (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by cicely9.cicely.de (8.12.9/8.12.8) with ESMTP id h3FN5GtA004739;
	Wed, 16 Apr 2003 01:05:17 +0200 (CEST)
	(envelope-from ticso@cicely9.cicely.de)
Received: (from ticso@localhost)
	by cicely9.cicely.de (8.12.9/8.12.9/Submit) id h3FN5FCC004738;
	Wed, 16 Apr 2003 01:05:16 +0200 (CEST)
	(envelope-from ticso)
Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2003 01:05:15 +0200
From: Bernd Walter <ticso@cicely9.cicely.de>
To: "M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com>
Message-ID: <20030415230514.GS529@cicely9.cicely.de>
References: <20030414154016.GN16153@cicely9.cicely.de>
	<20030416.000421.39225367.sanpei@sanpei.org>
	<20030415151806.GL529@cicely9.cicely.de>
	<20030415.160640.112623304.imp@bsdimp.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20030415.160640.112623304.imp@bsdimp.com>
X-Operating-System: FreeBSD cicely9.cicely.de 5.0-CURRENT alpha
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.3i
cc: current@freebsd.org
cc: ticso@cicely9.cicely.de
cc: ticso@cicely.de
cc: sanpei@sanpei.org
Subject: Re: tested ehci driver with 5-current/IBM ThinkPad240
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
Reply-To: ticso@cicely.de
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2003 23:05:42 -0000

On Tue, Apr 15, 2003 at 04:06:40PM -0600, M. Warner Losh wrote:
> Looks more like a resource allocation glitch to me.  Devices shouldn't
> be mapped to the same address...

For standard PCI cards it would be the BIOS fault, but who does this
for cardbus devices?

-- 
B.Walter                   BWCT                http://www.bwct.de
ticso@bwct.de                                  info@bwct.de