From owner-freebsd-security@freebsd.org  Sun Sep  8 17:11:18 2019
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-security@freebsd.org>
Delivered-To: freebsd-security@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1])
 by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA230D5526
 for <freebsd-security@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org>;
 Sun,  8 Sep 2019 17:11:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ml@netfence.it)
Received: from soth.netfence.it (net-2-44-121-52.cust.vodafonedsl.it
 [2.44.121.52])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits))
 (Client CN "mailserver.netfence.it",
 Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK))
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46RHrN6R2Hz3HVj
 for <freebsd-security@freebsd.org>; Sun,  8 Sep 2019 17:11:16 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from ml@netfence.it)
Received: from alamar.ventu (alamar.local.netfence.it [10.1.2.18])
 (authenticated bits=0)
 by soth.netfence.it (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id x88GGm7i084781
 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO);
 Sun, 8 Sep 2019 18:16:51 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from ml@netfence.it)
X-Authentication-Warning: soth.netfence.it: Host alamar.local.netfence.it
 [10.1.2.18] claimed to be alamar.ventu
Subject: Re: Let's Encrypt
To: Victor Sudakov <vas@mpeks.tomsk.su>, freebsd-security@freebsd.org
References: <20190908145835.GA67269@admin.sibptus.ru>
From: Andrea Venturoli <ml@netfence.it>
Message-ID: <420387ba-e607-6eff-6413-a2585fd8baac@netfence.it>
Date: Sun, 8 Sep 2019 18:16:48 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/68.1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20190908145835.GA67269@admin.sibptus.ru>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 46RHrN6R2Hz3HVj
X-Spamd-Bar: --
Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none;
 spf=none (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of ml@netfence.it has no SPF policy when
 checking 2.44.121.52) smtp.mailfrom=ml@netfence.it
X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-2.87 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[];
 RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000,0];
 FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[];
 IP_SCORE(-1.77)[ip: (-5.73), ipnet: 2.44.0.0/16(-2.87), asn: 30722(-0.28),
 country: IT(0.03)]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain];
 HAS_XAW(0.00)[]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[netfence.it]; AUTH_NA(1.00)[];
 NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0];
 TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2];
 R_SPF_NA(0.00)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[];
 MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+];
 ASN(0.00)[asn:30722, ipnet:2.44.0.0/16, country:IT];
 MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[];
 RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]
X-BeenThere: freebsd-security@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Security issues \[members-only posting\]"
 <freebsd-security.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-security>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-security-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-security/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-security@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-security-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-security>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-security-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 08 Sep 2019 17:11:18 -0000

On 2019-09-08 16:58, Victor Sudakov wrote:
> Dear Colleagues,
> 
> Which client is now recommended to work with Let's Encrypt?
> 
> I see numerous clients in the ports tree, some deleted, some renamed...
> Which one is good?

I'm happy with acme.sh.
Don't know about the others.

  bye
	av.