From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Apr 14 20:04:59 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 114C71065671 for ; Mon, 14 Apr 2008 20:04:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from scain@exgenesis.com) Received: from mout.perfora.net (mout.perfora.net [74.208.4.196]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD5438FC15 for ; Mon, 14 Apr 2008 20:04:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from scain@exgenesis.com) Received: from [192.168.13.10] (adsl-70-250-185-25.dsl.rcsntx.swbell.net [70.250.185.25]) by mrelay.perfora.net (node=mrus1) with ESMTP (Nemesis) id 0MKpCa-1JlUv705pY-0007mY; Mon, 14 Apr 2008 16:04:56 -0400 From: Shelby Cain To: Mel In-Reply-To: <200804112213.11326.fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net> References: <1207855812.11735.39.camel@localhost> <200804110035.04406.fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net> <1207924977.29840.7.camel@localhost> <200804112213.11326.fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-lOeensw//AoLMVtz9oUV" Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2008 15:04:51 -0500 Message-Id: <1208203491.13250.1.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.12.1 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1+GiyJnl8yQEG0sRY6UFFq7DLe89WmUsf5MTaq 3qscUTsUnSk/k+9wRhj92z0JLmDa+ma0fJEufQS8wVmIaHL/Vx ZIdyttz/6JBa2St4PNoaj6PShAF4nQx Cc: Edward Capriolo , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Invoking ldconfig without arguments wipes all hints and makes me very sad X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2008 20:04:59 -0000 --=-lOeensw//AoLMVtz9oUV Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, 2008-04-11 at 22:13 +0200, Mel wrote: > On Friday 11 April 2008 16:42:57 Shelby Cain wrote: > > > > Why does "factory settings" not include scanning the built-in system > > library path /usr/lib? From the man page, it would seem that if I trul= y > > wanted to remove all runtime information I'd want to run something alon= g > > the lines of ldconfig -s. Am I misreading something? >=20 > It should, otherwise it's a bug in either the manpage or ldconfig. >=20 Alright, assuming I'm not hallucinating I'll file an appropriate bug report. > > Also, under what circumstances does -v actually do something? I can't > > seem to find a case where -v actually alters the output of ldconfig. >=20 > When it does something. For example, if your cache contains libfoo.so.1 a= nd=20 > you installed /usr/local/lib/libfoo.so.2, then ldconfig -vm /usr/local/li= b=20 > will print: > Updating libfoo.so.1.0 to /usr/local/lib/libfoo.so.2 >=20 Ok, thanks. Regards, Shelby Cain --=-lOeensw//AoLMVtz9oUV Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBIA7jjFioAnfS4MHQRAuT7AJ9FbmmKt+znCOum9a5mjLXLI4k53gCeIgi/ YZdkjBMuOxB1u5VFBsPAb+I= =X8FS -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-lOeensw//AoLMVtz9oUV--