From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 19 11:46:27 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C80F916A418 for ; Mon, 19 Nov 2007 11:46:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vasanth@juniper.net) Received: from exprod7og107.obsmtp.com (exprod7og107.obsmtp.com [64.18.2.167]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D8CC13C45B for ; Mon, 19 Nov 2007 11:46:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vasanth@juniper.net) Received: from source ([66.129.224.36]) by exprod7ob107.postini.com ([64.18.6.12]) with SMTP; Mon, 19 Nov 2007 03:46:08 PST Received: from gaugeboson.jnpr.net ([10.209.194.17]) by emailsmtp55.jnpr.net with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Mon, 19 Nov 2007 03:12:28 -0800 Received: from emailbng3.jnpr.net ([10.209.194.27]) by gaugeboson.jnpr.net with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Mon, 19 Nov 2007 16:41:58 +0530 Received: from [10.209.148.50] ([10.209.148.50]) by emailbng3.jnpr.net with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Mon, 19 Nov 2007 16:39:27 +0530 From: vasanth rao naik To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: 20040219065210.GA6725@panzer.kdm.org Content-Type: text/plain Organization: Juniper networks Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2007 16:32:33 +0530 Message-Id: <1195470153.12340.35.camel@vasanth-lnx> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.10.3 (2.10.3-4.fc7) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 19 Nov 2007 11:09:27.0492 (UTC) FILETIME=[A6646040:01C82A9C] X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 19 Nov 2007 12:25:14 +0000 Subject: problem with ld-elf.so.1 install X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2007 11:46:27 -0000 Hello People, I have come accross the same issue as our friend Kenneth Merry about which he specified in his previous mail in this thread. Kenneth Merry Wrote: >So, it looks like find_symdef() is returning a bogus value for def, and >NULL for defobj, which causes a NULL pointer deference at line 197. I got the core in rcp with the same segmentation fault. I wanted to know if this problem is fixed. If yes could some one please mail me the link for the fix. I would be highly grateful to everyone. -- -- Vasanth