From owner-freebsd-hackers  Mon Feb  5 23:47:27 1996
Return-Path: owner-hackers
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id XAA05580
          for hackers-outgoing; Mon, 5 Feb 1996 23:47:27 -0800 (PST)
Received: from nixpbe.pdb.sni.de (mail.sni.de [192.109.2.33])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with ESMTP id XAA05572
          for <hackers@freebsd.org>; Mon, 5 Feb 1996 23:46:46 -0800 (PST)
Received: (from nerv@localhost) by nixpbe.pdb.sni.de (8.6.12/8.6.12) id IAA24405 for hackers@freebsd.org; Tue, 6 Feb 1996 08:44:11 +0100
Message-Id: <199602060744.IAA24405@nixpbe.pdb.sni.de>
Subject: Re: Willows
To: jkh@time.cdrom.com (Jordan K. Hubbard)
Date: Tue, 6 Feb 96 8:39:59 MET
From: Greg Lehey <lehey.pad@sni.de>
Cc: hackers@freebsd.org (Hackers; FreeBSD)
In-Reply-To: <25575.823562101@time.cdrom.com>; from "Jordan K. Hubbard" at Feb 05, 96 3:15 pm
X-Mailer: xmail 2.4 (based on ELM 2.2 PL16)
Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org
Precedence: bulk

>
>> Wine may not use LDTs, but if you don't set the appropriate option
>> (USER_LDT, from memory) in the kernel config, wine refuses to try to
>> work.  Nothing else does, so I suppose it doesn't use user LDTs.
>
> Huh?  Wine most definitely DOES use USER_LDTs.  I don't know how you
> manage to come to the conclusion above - UTSL! :-)

Sorry, I wasn't being quite serious.  I'm quite convinced that it does
use user LDTs.  But I can't prove it: thus "Wine may not use LDTs".
"I suppose it doesn't use user LDTs" refers to "Nothing else does".

UTSL?

Greg