From owner-freebsd-ports Wed Jan 13 11:09:28 1999 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id LAA03159 for freebsd-ports-outgoing; Wed, 13 Jan 1999 11:09:28 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from gratis.grondar.za (gratis.grondar.za [196.7.18.65]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id LAA03136 for ; Wed, 13 Jan 1999 11:09:20 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from mark@grondar.za) Received: from greenpeace.grondar.za (greenpeace.grondar.za [196.7.18.132]) by gratis.grondar.za (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id UAA81758 for ; Wed, 13 Jan 1999 20:38:55 +0200 (SAST) (envelope-from mark@grondar.za) Received: from grondar.za (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by greenpeace.grondar.za (8.9.2/8.9.2) with ESMTP id UAA01831 for ; Wed, 13 Jan 1999 20:38:53 +0200 (SAST) (envelope-from mark@grondar.za) Message-Id: <199901131838.UAA01831@greenpeace.grondar.za> To: ports@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: nvi-perl is obsoloete? Date: Wed, 13 Jan 1999 20:38:46 +0200 From: Mark Murray Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Hi Anyone mind if I nuke nvi-perl? Current's nvi is perl-capable. M -- Mark Murray Join the anti-SPAM movement: http://www.cauce.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message