From owner-freebsd-security Thu Apr 15 12:30:59 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Received: from fep04-svc.tin.it (mta04-acc.tin.it [212.216.176.35]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B6F414E2D for ; Thu, 15 Apr 1999 12:30:49 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from molter@tin.it) Received: from nympha.ecomotor.it ([212.216.29.181]) by fep04-svc.tin.it (InterMail v4.0 201-221-105) with SMTP id <19990415192826.EXBN9313.fep04-svc@nympha.ecomotor.it> for ; Thu, 15 Apr 1999 21:28:26 +0200 Received: (qmail 2062 invoked by uid 1000); 15 Apr 1999 18:40:33 -0000 From: "Marco Molteni" Date: Thu, 15 Apr 1999 20:40:33 +0200 (CEST) X-Sender: molter@localhost To: Joe Orthoefer Cc: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Subject: Re: KAME ipsec and cisco IOS In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Wed, 14 Apr 1999, Joe Orthoefer wrote: > Is it currently possible to get a cisco with ipsec and a freebsd box > running the KAME stuff to pass encrypted traffic back and forth > (ipv4+ipsec)? I realize the problem is principly the key management > between the two. Has anyone even attempted this? Is there a better place > to ask this question? Joe, try the mailing list snap-users@kame.net Marco --- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message