From owner-freebsd-questions  Mon Nov  2 19:10:48 1998
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id TAA27504
          for freebsd-questions-outgoing; Mon, 2 Nov 1998 19:10:48 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG)
Received: from amber.eaznet.com (amber.eaznet.com [216.19.20.5])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id TAA27495
          for <questions@freebsd.org>; Mon, 2 Nov 1998 19:10:46 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from eddie@amber.eaznet.com)
Received: (from eddie@localhost)
	by amber.eaznet.com (8.8.7/8.8.5) id UAA00819
	for questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 2 Nov 1998 20:16:23 -0700 (MST)
Date: Mon, 2 Nov 1998 20:16:23 -0700 (MST)
From: Eddie Fry <eddie@amber.eaznet.com>
Message-Id: <199811030316.UAA00819@amber.eaznet.com>
To: questions@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: du vs. df
Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

I've been using FreeBSD for a while now, and have not
previously encountered this problem.

When I run a df -k, /var reports ~132M used.  When I
run du -k /var, I get 33M used.  What happened to the
other 100M?

Probably something obvious, but I've had one hell of a 
day and it's getting late.

P.S. - Sorry for the line wrapping.

Thanks,

Eddie

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message