From owner-freebsd-current Tue Oct 22 6:48:37 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E1FAC37B404 for ; Tue, 22 Oct 2002 06:48:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (critter.freebsd.dk [212.242.86.163]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C66A643E65 for ; Tue, 22 Oct 2002 06:48:35 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from phk@critter.freebsd.dk) Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by critter.freebsd.dk (8.12.6/8.12.6) with ESMTP id g9MDkun4020937; Tue, 22 Oct 2002 15:47:01 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from phk@critter.freebsd.dk) To: Vitaly Markitantov Cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: current vs stable performance compare? In-Reply-To: Your message of "Tue, 22 Oct 2002 16:40:05 +0300." <20021022134005.GB31769@iron.del.local> Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2002 15:46:56 +0200 Message-ID: <20936.1035294416@critter.freebsd.dk> From: Poul-Henning Kamp Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG In message <20021022134005.GB31769@iron.del.local>, Vitaly Markitantov writes: >Where i can found performance comparison of -CURRENT over -STABLE systems? Very little has been done yet, -CURRENT is not expected to perform particularly well until more of the kernel is out from under the Giant lock. -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message