From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 22 22:26:15 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD4E3106567D for ; Tue, 22 Nov 2011 22:26:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from amvandemore@gmail.com) Received: from mail-bw0-f54.google.com (mail-bw0-f54.google.com [209.85.214.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B99E8FC12 for ; Tue, 22 Nov 2011 22:26:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: by bkbzs8 with SMTP id zs8so1062221bkb.13 for ; Tue, 22 Nov 2011 14:26:13 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=N9BX2Z4lYoyQVn2pzd4Z3EGoGP37mrrffbIQiMtdofI=; b=DfybUuRlLn0Cji35eHEzLRdi74lYRpzFLZM4mrexNm67/qLaprbdL4fupjIfvnjE92 azsLUQvwUn8qhLayD7exiBHOYlcryay3Iu6vymRekBzI0AVeQWzlaglKp+AwMFC/Zgwc cu5OWIYpsw4sgX6AAppvZVYZSJZhMkMBjFiEc= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.205.142.4 with SMTP id jg4mr14556857bkc.119.1322000772925; Tue, 22 Nov 2011 14:26:12 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.223.88.72 with HTTP; Tue, 22 Nov 2011 14:26:12 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <763864D4-CC19-4473-AFAF-D22EF94E08A2@gmail.com> References: <2973_1321996526_4ECC10EE_2973_123_1_D9B37353831173459FDAA836D3B43499D2C69D77@WADPMBXV0.waddell.com> <4B28ADC5-8325-442E-8F02-9AE3535D8C6D@gmail.com> <763864D4-CC19-4473-AFAF-D22EF94E08A2@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2011 16:26:12 -0600 Message-ID: From: Adam Vande More To: Kees Jan Koster Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Gary Gatten , Michael Sierchio , "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: Diagnosing packet loss X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2011 22:26:15 -0000 On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 4:11 PM, Kees Jan Koster wrote: > [kjkoster@saffron ~]$ ifconfig bge0 > bge0: flags=8843 metric 0 mtu 1500 > > options=8009b > ether 00:e0:81:32:ed:b4 > inet 91.196.169.165 netmask 0xfffffff8 broadcast 91.196.169.167 > inet 91.196.169.166 netmask 0xffffffff broadcast 91.196.169.166 > media: Ethernet autoselect (100baseTX > ) > status: active > [kjkoster@saffron ~]$ fgrep bge0 /etc/rc.conf > ifconfig_bge0="inet 91.196.169.165 netmask 255.255.255.248" > ifconfig_bge0_alias0="91.196.169.166 netmask 255.255.255.255" > > That broadcast address and netmask look wrong for sure. > > Should I just change that to 255.255.255.248 as well? > No, that is correct. Leave your alias alone if you want it to continue to work. -- Adam Vande More