Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 7 Mar 2011 22:42:19 +0100
From:      Roman Divacky <rdivacky@FreeBSD.org>
To:        Martin Matuska <mm@FreeBSD.org>
Cc:        svn-src-head@FreeBSD.org, svn-src-all@FreeBSD.org, src-committers@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: svn commit: r219374 - in head/contrib/gcc: . config/i386 doc
Message-ID:  <20110307214219.GA6472@freebsd.org>
In-Reply-To: <201103071448.p27EmNrp038046@svn.freebsd.org>
References:  <201103071448.p27EmNrp038046@svn.freebsd.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Mar 07, 2011 at 02:48:23PM +0000, Martin Matuska wrote:
> Author: mm
> Date: Mon Mar  7 14:48:22 2011
> New Revision: 219374
> URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/219374
> 
> Log:
>   Backport Intel Core 2 and AMD Geode CPU types from gcc-4.3 (GPLv2)
>   These options are supported in this shape in all newer GCC versions.
>   
>   PR:		gnu/155308
>   Obtained from:	gcc 4.3 (rev. 118090, 118973, 120846; GPLv2)
>   MFC after:	2 weeks

is the MFC actually safe without the newer binutils being merged as well?

just wondering....



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20110307214219.GA6472>