From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 10 02:21:34 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: current@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 534AF16A400 for ; Tue, 10 Jul 2007 02:21:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@jnielsen.net) Received: from ns1.jnielsen.net (ns1.jnielsen.net [69.55.238.237]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3743C13C459 for ; Tue, 10 Jul 2007 02:21:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@jnielsen.net) Received: from localhost (jn@ns1 [69.55.238.237]) (authenticated bits=0) by ns1.jnielsen.net (8.12.9p2/8.12.9) with ESMTP id l6A22DpT061564 for ; Mon, 9 Jul 2007 22:02:14 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from lists@jnielsen.net) From: John Nielsen To: current@freebsd.org Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2007 22:01:29 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.7 X-Face: #X5#Y*q>F:]zT!DegL3z5Xo'^MN[$8k\[4^3rN~wm=s=Uw(sW}R?3b^*f1Wu*. X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version 0.88.4, clamav-milter version 0.88.4 on ns1.jnielsen.net X-Virus-Status: Clean Cc: Subject: geom_fox vs gmultipath X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2007 02:21:34 -0000 I was just reading the (pre-) release notes for 7.0 at http://people.freebsd.org/~bmah/relnotes/CURRENT/relnotes.html and learned about mjacob's gmultipath(8) implementation, which seems very similar to phk's older geom_fox(4) but perhaps a bit more polished. First off, is that a correct assessment? I haven't used either, but externally gmultipath is distinguished by having its own control utility (rather than relying on geom(8)), a manpage (and perhaps other features) more consistent with other geom utilities, and support for predictable volume names under /dev/multipath/. Assuming I'm basically on target so far, does geom_fox have any features that are not in gmultipath? If not, should it be considered deprecated? (or should gmultipath be considered experimental since it's newer?) I'm just curious, esp. since I may have a need for one of the two in the near future. Thanks, JN