From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Apr 25 19:11:18 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6DB7106564A for ; Mon, 25 Apr 2011 19:11:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from julian@freebsd.org) Received: from vps1.elischer.org (vps1.elischer.org [204.109.63.16]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B8D698FC28 for ; Mon, 25 Apr 2011 19:11:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from julian-mac.elischer.org (home-nat.elischer.org [67.100.89.137]) (authenticated bits=0) by vps1.elischer.org (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p3PJB0Fe067918 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 25 Apr 2011 12:11:03 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from julian@freebsd.org) Message-ID: <4DB5C77B.5000605@freebsd.org> Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2011 12:11:55 -0700 From: Julian Elischer User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X 10.4; en-US; rv:1.9.2.15) Gecko/20110303 Thunderbird/3.1.9 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: fbsdmail@dnswatch.com References: <2b2485288a6e492b3c5c94cc21c79949.dnswclient@www.dnswatch.com> In-Reply-To: <2b2485288a6e492b3c5c94cc21c79949.dnswclient@www.dnswatch.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: two /24's and only one gateway - is routing still possible? X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2011 19:11:19 -0000 On 4/25/11 11:47 AM, fbsdmail@dnswatch.com wrote: > Greetings, > I've been trying to figure an ideal solution to this for some time, > and thought I'd post the question here to see if anyone else is working > with this situation. > Here's my scenario; > I have a /24 with a prefix of 168.103.150.xxx with a gateway on this prefix > (DSLmodem). > I also have a /24 with a prefix of 75.160.109.xxx > My question(s) is/are: > 1) is it possible to route both of these across the same GW? > 2) if answer to 1) == NO, what might I do? you probably need to make a routing request to your ISP to ask them to advertise that 75.160.109.xxx is available via 168.103.150.x they may charge you $$ to do so or may not even want to do it. They may also require proof that you own them. this may be a problem as they are owed by cox communications and Quest. you'd thus have to get permission from each ISP to route teh other.. ***red-tape*** > Thank you for all your time and consideration. > > --Chris >