From owner-freebsd-hackers Fri Dec 1 16:58:52 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mta4.rcsntx.swbell.net (mta4.rcsntx.swbell.net [151.164.30.28]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 468C037B400; Fri, 1 Dec 2000 16:58:50 -0800 (PST) Received: from holly.calldei.com ([208.191.149.190]) by mta4.rcsntx.swbell.net (Sun Internet Mail Server sims.3.5.2000.01.05.12.18.p9) with ESMTP id <0G4X00I8H1CZKW@mta4.rcsntx.swbell.net>; Fri, 1 Dec 2000 18:58:12 -0600 (CST) Received: (from chris@localhost) by holly.calldei.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) id SAA05635; Fri, 01 Dec 2000 18:58:52 -0600 (CST envelope-from chris) Date: Fri, 01 Dec 2000 18:58:41 -0600 From: Chris Costello Subject: Re: thr_sleep() and thr_wakeup() In-reply-to: To: John Baldwin Cc: hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Reply-To: chris@calldei.com Message-id: <20001201185841.A899@holly.calldei.com> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii User-Agent: Mutt/0.96.4i References: Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Friday, December 01, 2000, John Baldwin wrote: > Can we kill these syscalls? They are not used anywhere in the kernel and > although they have wrapper functions in libc, no header contains prototypes for > these wrappers. According to the CVS log they were originally brought in for > POSIX threads and AIO, neither of which use this facility. Comments? Agreed. Also, this is UNIX International thread namespace (thr_*). -- |Chris Costello |Your e-mail has been returned due to insufficient voltage. `---------------------------------------------------------- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message