From owner-freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 30 19:04:32 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 98BC416A407 for ; Thu, 30 Nov 2006 19:04:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from carton@Ivy.NET) Received: from sakima.Ivy.NET (sakima.Ivy.NET [69.31.131.60]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D7C543CB7 for ; Thu, 30 Nov 2006 19:04:18 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from carton@Ivy.NET) Received: from castrovalva.Ivy.NET (castrovalva.Ivy.NET [69.31.131.61]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by sakima.Ivy.NET (Postfix) with ESMTP id 102612FF63 for ; Thu, 30 Nov 2006 14:04:27 -0500 (EST) Received: by castrovalva.Ivy.NET (Postfix, from userid 405) id 476E112FB03; Thu, 30 Nov 2006 14:04:26 -0500 (EST) To: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org References: <755cb9fc0611290724q127f006va84f3457c48443b6@mail.gmail.com> <456E8D8B.8010102@orel.ru> <755cb9fc0611300454s4d28ad14rd402cba8388d49@mail.gmail.com> <14989d6e0611300700n3ac073bayc4584f2b1020ee61@mail.gmail.com> <755cb9fc0611300839y6deed1ceqf452018cc2f73737@mail.gmail.com> From: Miles Nordin MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.6 - "Maruoka") Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2006 14:04:26 -0500 In-Reply-To: <755cb9fc0611300839y6deed1ceqf452018cc2f73737@mail.gmail.com> (Alexandre Vieira's message of "Thu, 30 Nov 2006 16:39:25 +0000") Message-ID: User-Agent: T-gnus/6.17.2 (based on No Gnus v0.2) SEMI/1.14.6 (Maruoka) FLIM/1.14.7 (=?ISO-8859-4?Q?Sanj=F2?=) APEL/10.6 Emacs/21.4 (alpha--netbsd) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI) Subject: Re: Netra T1 105 (sparc64) optimization X-BeenThere: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the Sparc List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2006 19:04:32 -0000 >>>>> "av" == Alexandre Vieira writes: av> polling increased dramaticly the latency for all traffic that av> passes trough the bridge and reduced the transmission rate av> also. That's interesting. What do you mean by transmission rate? Are you seeing dropped packets?