From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jul 26 19:29:59 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66B9337B401 for ; Sat, 26 Jul 2003 19:29:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pgh.nepinc.com (pgh.nepinc.com [66.207.129.50]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 949AB43FAF for ; Sat, 26 Jul 2003 19:29:58 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from durham@jcdurham.com) Received: from jimslaptop.home.jcdurham.com (18.gibs5.xdsl.nauticom.net [209.195.184.19]) by pgh.nepinc.com (8.11.4/8.11.3) with ESMTP id h6R2Ttu85151; Sat, 26 Jul 2003 22:29:55 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from durham@jcdurham.com) From: Jim Durham Organization: JC Durham Consulting To: Wouter Clarie , freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Date: Sat, 26 Jul 2003 22:29:48 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.5.2 References: <200307251349.38413.durham@jcdurham.com> <20030726074239.GB61353@comp.chem.msu.su> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200307262229.48486.durham@jcdurham.com> Subject: Re: NATD and Address Redirection X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: durham@jcdurham.com List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 27 Jul 2003 02:29:59 -0000 On Saturday 26 July 2003 04:07 am, Wouter Clarie wrote: > On Sat, 26 Jul 2003, Yar Tikhiy wrote: > > Could you check if TELNET, HTTP, or SSH from the outside world to > > the inside machine works? The problem may have to do with VNC > > protocol peculiarities preventing it from working through NAT. > > (However, the VNC FAQ claims VNC will work through NAT.) > > VNC works through NAT just fine. Never had any problems with that. > Yes, I do that all the time, but in this case, the VNC *server* was the one behind the NAT, instead of the client, which is the usual case. -Jim