Date: Fri, 25 Mar 2005 01:52:43 -0800 From: Astrodog <astrodog@gmail.com> To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: AMD64 Ports Message-ID: <2fd864e05032501525fd3dbe6@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20050325062317.GB7662@dragon.NUXI.org> References: <2fd864e05032316492d805751@mail.gmail.com> <20050324011220.GA81046@isis.sigpipe.cz> <2fd864e050323182432f78eaa@mail.gmail.com> <20050324201036.GF60666@dragon.NUXI.org> <2fd864e05032412501c001a5d@mail.gmail.com> <20050324215445.GB99206@dragon.NUXI.org> <2fd864e05032415452721de81@mail.gmail.com> <20050325062317.GB7662@dragon.NUXI.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 24 Mar 2005 22:23:17 -0800, David O'Brien <obrien@freebsd.org> wrote: > On Thu, Mar 24, 2005 at 03:45:50PM -0800, Astrodog wrote: > > On Thu, 24 Mar 2005 13:54:45 -0800, David O'Brien <obrien@freebsd.org> wrote: > > > On Thu, Mar 24, 2005 at 12:50:13PM -0800, Astrodog wrote: > > > > We have 2 problems, that I see. > > > > #1. Linux32 doesn't appear to be addressed for dependancies at all, > > > > almost every linux-something port I've found, calls itsself i386 only, > > > > and sometimes has minor RPM issues. > > > > > > What are the minor RPM issues? I knew there are some (see archives for > > > the arguments over the way we currently igngore them). But a summary of > > > current issues would be good. > > > > The two that come up, that I've seen, > > Most all of the ports that rely on Linux compat, linux-jdk, > > linux-mozilla, etc, don't use the RPM properly, they're labeled ONLY > > FOT ARCHS i386. These are fixed with just adding amd64 to that list. > > Please post a typescript clearly showing the problem; or explain the > situation in detail. The working Acroread on my amd64 desktop says > things are working tolerably well. > Alright. > > Currently, without manual fetching and whatnot, you cannot easily > > install i386 packages. With IA32 support included, it should be > > possible to install 32-bit packages, and if the crosscompile is > > viable, 32-bit only ports. > > This needs some architectural work that no one has wrapped their heads > around. > How complete is the IA32 support? And... I guess there should be a compat/ia32, or somesuch? > -- David (obrien@FreeBSD.org) >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?2fd864e05032501525fd3dbe6>