From owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 7 02:30:23 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F37D7106564A for ; Sun, 7 Aug 2011 02:30:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E38178FC0A for ; Sun, 7 Aug 2011 02:30:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p772UN5d093492 for ; Sun, 7 Aug 2011 02:30:23 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) id p772UNkm093482; Sun, 7 Aug 2011 02:30:23 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Sun, 7 Aug 2011 02:30:23 GMT Message-Id: <201108070230.p772UNkm093482@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org From: Mark Linimon Cc: Subject: Re: gnu/158719: [patch] Fix kgdb(1) on sparc64 X-BeenThere: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Mark Linimon List-Id: Bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 Aug 2011 02:30:24 -0000 The following reply was made to PR gnu/158719; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Mark Linimon To: bug-followup@FreeBSD.org Cc: Subject: Re: gnu/158719: [patch] Fix kgdb(1) on sparc64 Date: Sat, 6 Aug 2011 21:28:24 -0500 ----- Forwarded message from Marius Strobl ----- Date: Sun, 7 Aug 2011 00:07:44 +0200 From: Marius Strobl To: peterjeremy@acm.org, freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org Cc: Subject: Re: gnu/158719: [patch] Fix kgdb(1) on sparc64 User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i On Sat, Aug 06, 2011 at 09:41:45PM +0000, marius@FreeBSD.org wrote: > Synopsis: [patch] Fix kgdb(1) on sparc64 > > State-Changed-From-To: open->closed > State-Changed-By: marius > State-Changed-When: Sat Aug 6 21:40:58 UTC 2011 > State-Changed-Why: > This was closed accidentally; while the problem was fixed in r224687 this PR shouldn't have been closed until that revision and the ones leading up to it are MFC'ed. ----- End forwarded message -----