Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 18 Jun 1999 01:14:20 -0700
From:      Darryl Okahata <darrylo@sr.hp.com>
To:        freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: vinum performance 
Message-ID:  <199906180814.BAA29087@mina.sr.hp.com>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Thu, 17 Jun 1999 17:47:47 %2B0930."

next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Greg Lehey <grog@lemis.com> wrote:

> On Thursday, 17 June 1999 at  3:43:10 -0400, David E. Cross wrote:
> > I have a drive that is rated at ~16 Meg/second, and indeed it delivers on t
> he
> > order of 15+ Meg/second.  If I use Vinum to create a concatinated device
> > of 2 such units performance drops to 2.5 Meg/sec.  This seems like a
> > drastic drop in performance. 
> 
> Indeed, if you're comparing apples with apples.

     Possible marginally-related data point: with the 3.1-RELEASE vinum, 
and with striped drives (yes, I know the original user is using
concatenated devices), I saw pretty bad write performance with the
default filesystem frag size.  Increasing the frag size (via newfs),
increased performance substantially.

--
	Darryl Okahata
	darrylo@sr.hp.com

DISCLAIMER: this message is the author's personal opinion and does not
constitute the support, opinion, or policy of Hewlett-Packard, or of the
little green men that have been following him all day.


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199906180814.BAA29087>