From owner-cvs-gnu Tue Aug 23 12:13:36 1994 Return-Path: cvs-gnu-owner Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.8/8.6.6) id MAA02779 for cvs-gnu-outgoing; Tue, 23 Aug 1994 12:13:36 -0700 Received: from isl-gate.elsy.cf.ac.uk (isl-gate.elsy.cf.ac.uk [131.251.22.1]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.8/8.6.6) with ESMTP id MAA02773; Tue, 23 Aug 1994 12:13:03 -0700 Received: by isl-gate.elsy.cf.ac.uk (8.6.9/1.34) id UAA00187; Tue, 23 Aug 1994 20:12:25 +0100 From: paul@isl.cf.ac.uk (Paul) Message-Id: <199408231912.UAA00187@isl-gate.elsy.cf.ac.uk> Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/gnu/usr.bin/cc26/cc Makefile To: ache@astral.msk.su (Andrew A. Chernov, Black Mage) Date: Tue, 23 Aug 1994 20:12:24 +0100 (BST) Cc: adam@freefall.cdrom.com, alm@freefall.cdrom.com, ats@freefall.cdrom.com, bde@freefall.cdrom.com, csgr@freefall.cdrom.com, cvs-gnu@freefall.cdrom.com, davidg@freefall.cdrom.com, dyson@freefall.cdrom.com, guido@freefall.cdrom.com, hsu@freefall.cdrom.com, jkh@freefall.cdrom.com, joerg@freefall.cdrom.com, jvh@freefall.cdrom.com, karl@freefall.cdrom.com, martin@freefall.cdrom.com, nate@freefall.cdrom.com, paul@freefall.cdrom.com, phk@freefall.cdrom.com, proven@freefall.cdrom.com, pst@freefall.cdrom.com, rgrimes@freefall.cdrom.com, rich@freefall.cdrom.com, sean@freefall.cdrom.com, sef@freefall.cdrom.com, smace@freefall.cdrom.com, sos@freefall.cdrom.com, wollman@freefall.cdrom.com In-Reply-To: from "Andrew A. Chernov, Black Mage" at Aug 23, 94 10:21:33 pm X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL23] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Length: 735 Sender: cvs-gnu-owner@freefall.cdrom.com Precedence: bulk In reply to Andrew A. Chernov, Black Mage who said > > It can cause problems with most GNU packages, which use configure > to sence 'gcc' as best than standard 'cc' and insert 'gcc' into > Makefile after it. Now anybody who want translate GNU stuff need > to be warned about this thing. That's not a problem. Those scripts select gcc over cc in the belief that gcc will somehow be better than cc. Well in our case it won't be because our cc IS gcc so the script can quite happily fail to find gcc and continue ahead "making do" with cc. -- Paul Richards, FreeBSD core team member. Intelligent Systems Laboratory, ELSYM ,University of Wales, College Cardiff Internet: paul@isl.cf.ac.uk, JANET(UK): RICHARDSDP@CARDIFF.AC.UK