From owner-cvs-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Apr 18 06:35:11 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76B1016A4CF for ; Sun, 18 Apr 2004 06:35:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp.dkm.cz (smtp.dkm.cz [62.24.64.34]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 222B543D5E for ; Sun, 18 Apr 2004 06:35:10 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from neuhauser@chello.cz) Received: (qmail 39605 invoked by uid 0); 18 Apr 2004 13:35:09 -0000 Received: from r3al16.mistral.cz (HELO isis.wad.cz) (213.220.229.16) by smtp.dkm.cz with SMTP; 18 Apr 2004 13:35:08 -0000 Received: by isis.wad.cz (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 6BBB12FDA01; Sun, 18 Apr 2004 14:35:39 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sun, 18 Apr 2004 14:35:39 +0200 From: Roman Neuhauser To: Trevor Johnson Message-ID: <20040418123539.GB348@isis.wad.cz> Mail-Followup-To: Trevor Johnson , Kirill Ponomarew , ports-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, portmgr@FreeBSD.org References: <200404171920.i3HJKVoD088405@repoman.freebsd.org> <20040417220810.M41949@blues.jpj.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040417220810.M41949@blues.jpj.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i cc: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org cc: portmgr@FreeBSD.org cc: Kirill Ponomarew cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org cc: ports-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/astro/celestia Makefile ports/astro/fooseti Makefile ports/astro/jday Makefile ports/databases/db3 Makefile ports/devel/fam Makefile ports/devel/gengetopt Makefile X-BeenThere: cvs-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the ports tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 18 Apr 2004 13:35:11 -0000 # trevor@jpj.net / 2004-04-17 22:11:51 -0400: > Maybe the default CONFIGURE_TARGET in bsd.port.mk ought to be changed, or > a second default (--build=...) made available? Last time I looked at this it seemed there was no easy way to determine whether the configure script wanted the target in the --build= switch or as an argument. But perhaps CONFIGURE_TARGET:= --build=${CONFIGURE_TARGET} in the individual ports would be a welcome change? -- If you cc me or remove the list(s) completely I'll most likely ignore your message. see http://www.eyrie.org./~eagle/faqs/questions.html