From owner-freebsd-current  Wed Oct  9 23:42:14 1996
Return-Path: owner-current
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id XAA23819
          for current-outgoing; Wed, 9 Oct 1996 23:42:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from godzilla.zeta.org.au (godzilla.zeta.org.au [203.2.228.19])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id XAA23814
          for <freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org>; Wed, 9 Oct 1996 23:42:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from bde@localhost) by godzilla.zeta.org.au (8.7.6/8.6.9) id QAA08305; Thu, 10 Oct 1996 16:37:40 +1000
Date: Thu, 10 Oct 1996 16:37:40 +1000
From: Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au>
Message-Id: <199610100637.QAA08305@godzilla.zeta.org.au>
To: luigi@labinfo.iet.unipi.it, sthaug@nethelp.no
Subject: Re: 961006-SNAP comments
Cc: danj@netcom.com, freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org, henrich@crh.cl.msu.edu,
        julian@whistle.com
Sender: owner-current@FreeBSD.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

>2. Use DEVFS for the devices.
>
>Any reason why this wouldn't work?

Yes, devfs is too broken to use. E.g., anyone can chmod and chown
anything in it.

Bruce