From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 7 06:43:44 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2BAE316A4CE for ; Mon, 7 Jun 2004 06:43:44 +0000 (GMT) Received: from rwcrmhc11.comcast.net (rwcrmhc11.comcast.net [204.127.198.35]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1989843D46 for ; Mon, 7 Jun 2004 06:43:44 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from DougB@freebsd.org) Received: from lap (c-24-130-110-32.we.client2.attbi.com[24.130.110.32]) by comcast.net (rwcrmhc11) with SMTP id <2004060706434001300cphb5e>; Mon, 7 Jun 2004 06:43:41 +0000 Date: Sun, 6 Jun 2004 23:43:41 -0700 (PDT) From: Doug Barton To: Oliver Eikemeier In-Reply-To: <408117AD.4000101@fillmore-labs.com> Message-ID: <20040606234038.F1850@ync.qbhto.arg> References: <200404171307.49957.ports@webteckies.org> <408117AD.4000101@fillmore-labs.com> Organization: http://www.FreeBSD.org/ X-message-flag: Outlook -- Not just for spreading viruses anymore! MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed cc: "ports@FreeBSD.org" cc: Melvyn Sopacua Subject: Re: PORT_REPLACES_BASE_BIND and some gnome ports X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Jun 2004 06:43:44 -0000 On Sat, 17 Apr 2004, Oliver Eikemeier wrote: > Try PORT_REPLACES_BASE_BIND8_INCLUDES. We can't check this from the Makefile > though, but better be safe than sorry - it caused problems in the past. The problem with the includes was always BIND 8 only, it never affected BIND 9. Also, the fix went in 2.5 months ago. I would suggest that after the next BIND 8 (and 8.4.x) upgrade (which should be soon) that you change your test to look explicitly for PORT_REPLACES_BASE_BIND8_INCLUDES and not raise FUD where it isn't warranted. Doug -- This .signature sanitized for your protection