From owner-freebsd-hackers Wed Sep 1 14:25:49 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from jade.chc-chimes.com (jade.chc-chimes.com [216.28.46.6]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C9D114EBB for ; Wed, 1 Sep 1999 14:25:48 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from billf@jade.chc-chimes.com) Received: by jade.chc-chimes.com (Postfix, from userid 1001) id E6FC01C0E; Wed, 1 Sep 1999 16:27:59 -0400 (EDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by jade.chc-chimes.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E259A3815; Wed, 1 Sep 1999 16:27:59 -0400 (EDT) Date: Wed, 1 Sep 1999 16:27:59 -0400 (EDT) From: Bill Fumerola To: Luiz Morte da Costa Junior Cc: Pete Mckenna , Kevin Lynn , freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: L440GX+ Server Board In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Wed, 1 Sep 1999, Luiz Morte da Costa Junior wrote: > > The onboard NIC works like any other Intel 10/100 using fxp0, adding a > > asecond nic makes the onboard fxp1 (for failover purposes, I assume) > > I think that I don't have problem with my NIC (Intel 10/100). The bus that the onboard NIC is on probably gets probed later then then the expansion bus. -- - bill fumerola - billf@chc-chimes.com - BF1560 - computer horizons corp - - ph:(800) 252-2421 - bfumerol@computerhorizons.com - billf@FreeBSD.org - To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message