Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2009 12:22:52 -0700 From: Doug Barton <dougb@FreeBSD.org> To: Adrian Penisoara <ady@freebsd.ady.ro> Cc: freebsd-rc@freebsd.org, d@delphij.net Subject: Re: [RFC] script for binding ARP <-> IP pairs Message-ID: <4A943A0C.9000305@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <78cb3d3f0908250748j16ff3879y4ea28fd83b0780c0@mail.gmail.com> References: <4A7B2792.4090803@delphij.net> <4A7F948A.2040602@delphij.net> <4A7F9EC6.9090605@FreeBSD.org> <4A7FAA42.4030607@delphij.net> <alpine.BSF.2.00.0908092234390.50801@qbhto.arg> <78cb3d3f0908101113s412021adk8956dd083a8fed72@mail.gmail.com> <4A806D17.9020404@delphij.net> <4A933294.8000906@delphij.net> <4A93351E.2020107@FreeBSD.org> <4A933B77.7030108@delphij.net> <78cb3d3f0908250748j16ff3879y4ea28fd83b0780c0@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Adrian Penisoara wrote:
>> For consistency we should leave it as "arp_xxx" like it's currently done
>> for static_routes/route_xxx and ipv6_static_routes/ipv6_route_xxx ...
The fact that there are legacy examples that don't use a consistent
prepend is not a reason to add more.
Doug
--
This .signature sanitized for your protection
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4A943A0C.9000305>