Date: 18 Jun 1999 11:18:02 -0400 From: Chris Shenton <cshenton@uucom.com> To: Frank Tobin <ftobin@bigfoot.com> Cc: freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: securelevel descr Message-ID: <lfn1xxfsgl.fsf@Samizdat.uucom.com> In-Reply-To: Frank Tobin's message of "Fri, 18 Jun 1999 01:35:49 -0500 (CDT)" References: <Pine.BSF.4.10.9906180119201.50701-100000@srh0710.urh.uiuc.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, 18 Jun 1999 01:35:49 -0500 (CDT), Frank Tobin <ftobin@bigfoot.com> said: Frank> Of course, your daemon better not die in this scenario, or you Frank> have to be running inetd. Your inetdn't should really be dying Frank> though :) But if inetd can start daemons on priv ports, then a cracker can just modify inetd.conf to start (say) "nc" on the telnet port. Or am I missing something? To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?lfn1xxfsgl.fsf>