From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Apr 25 14:28:07 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F01237B401 for ; Fri, 25 Apr 2003 14:28:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from lurza.secnetix.de (lurza.secnetix.de [212.66.1.130]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EEE3943FBD for ; Fri, 25 Apr 2003 14:28:05 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from olli@lurza.secnetix.de) Received: from lurza.secnetix.de (patmze@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by lurza.secnetix.de (8.12.8p1/8.12.8) with ESMTP id h3PLS1B5018072; Fri, 25 Apr 2003 23:28:02 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from oliver.fromme@secnetix.de) Received: (from olli@localhost) by lurza.secnetix.de (8.12.8p1/8.12.8/Submit) id h3PLS0nj018071; Fri, 25 Apr 2003 23:28:00 +0200 (CEST) Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2003 23:28:00 +0200 (CEST) Message-Id: <200304252128.h3PLS0nj018071@lurza.secnetix.de> From: Oliver Fromme To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG, rhett@alasir.com In-Reply-To: <20030425024223.8861.qmail@web21503.mail.yahoo.com> X-Newsgroups: list.freebsd-stable User-Agent: tin/1.5.4-20000523 ("1959") (UNIX) (FreeBSD/4.8-RELEASE (i386)) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: top failure X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG, rhett@alasir.com List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2003 21:28:07 -0000 RMH wrote: > FAQ doesn't solve the problem, because: > a) both kernel and world are from 4.7-RC1, i.e synchronised; > b) kernel was loaded in usual way, through /boot/loader. > > The problem is, that kernel _without_symbols_ doesn't work with > libkvm, but otherwise does fine. Why? Also interesting that this > doesn't happen on -CURRENT. Is it a bug of libkvm? Can anyone > reproduce this issue on -STABLE or 4.8-RELEASE? Did you strip(1) your kernel? If so, it explains what you are seeing. Don't do that. Regards Oliver -- Oliver Fromme, secnetix GmbH & Co KG, Oettingenstr. 2, 80538 München Any opinions expressed in this message may be personal to the author and may not necessarily reflect the opinions of secnetix in any way. "People who claim Windows is superior to Unix are the same people who'd argue that you better use your hand instead of toilet paper to wipe your ass. I can hear them now - 'It's colourful and it's intuitive and easy to use and even a child could do it.'" -- (unknown)