From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon May  5 11:53:57 2003
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D2F8D37B401
	for <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>;
	Mon,  5 May 2003 11:53:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (critter.freebsd.dk [212.242.86.163])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9407743F75
	for <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>;
	Mon,  5 May 2003 11:53:56 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from phk@phk.freebsd.dk)
Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by critter.freebsd.dk (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h45IrrLr044710;
	Mon, 5 May 2003 20:53:54 +0200 (CEST)
	(envelope-from phk@phk.freebsd.dk)
To: Paul Mather <paul@gromit.dlib.vt.edu>
From: "Poul-Henning Kamp" <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Mon, 05 May 2003 13:51:27 EDT."
             <20030505175127.GA32901@gromit.dlib.vt.edu> 
Date: Mon, 05 May 2003 20:53:53 +0200
Message-ID: <44709.1052160833@critter.freebsd.dk>
cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Disk labelling: WARNING: Expected rawoffset 37752750, found 0 
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 May 2003 18:53:58 -0000

In message <20030505175127.GA32901@gromit.dlib.vt.edu>, Paul Mather writes:

>I have two main questions:
>
>1) What are the semantics of ad0s2c, and have they changed recently?
>   (When disklabel says "whole unit" in the disklabel message above,
>   does it really mean "whole slice" [as opposed to "whole disk?"]?)

The semantics are somewhat in a flux, but the 'c' (or RAW_PART) is
still magic at this point.

>2) Does the "WARNING: Expected rawoffset 37752750, found 0" spell
>   trouble ahead, and if so, what should I do to fix it?

It should be harmless.

I would be very interested if you could try to compile the "bsdlabel"
program in src/sbin/bsdlabel and tell me what that says about your
disk.

-- 
Poul-Henning Kamp       | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
phk@FreeBSD.ORG         | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer       | BSD since 4.3-tahoe    
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.