From owner-cvs-all Wed Nov 17 5:38:18 1999 Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from flood.ping.uio.no (flood.ping.uio.no [129.240.78.31]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B97B8152CA; Wed, 17 Nov 1999 05:37:33 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from des@flood.ping.uio.no) Received: (from des@localhost) by flood.ping.uio.no (8.9.3/8.9.3) id OAA48195; Wed, 17 Nov 1999 14:37:27 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from des) To: Andre Albsmeier Cc: Peter Wemm , cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/usr.sbin/inetd inetd.c References: <199911170332.TAA55014@freefall.freebsd.org> <19991117142642.A52979@internal> From: Dag-Erling Smorgrav Date: 17 Nov 1999 14:37:26 +0100 In-Reply-To: Andre Albsmeier's message of "Wed, 17 Nov 1999 14:26:42 +0100" Message-ID: Lines: 12 User-Agent: Gnus/5.070097 (Pterodactyl Gnus v0.97) Emacs/20.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk Andre Albsmeier writes: > What do people think about bringing the whole -current's inetd into > -stable? I have done this on all of my 20 machines (mainly for the > internal identd suppert) and I didn't experience any problems... I'm seriously considering doing just that. I too have run -CURRENT's inetd on -STABLE machines (production systems, even) with no perceptible problems. DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - des@flood.ping.uio.no To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message