From owner-freebsd-hackers  Thu Sep 12 11:19:04 1996
Return-Path: owner-hackers
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id LAA20388
          for hackers-outgoing; Thu, 12 Sep 1996 11:19:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from phaeton.artisoft.com (phaeton.Artisoft.COM [198.17.250.211])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id LAA20380
          for <hackers@freebsd.org>; Thu, 12 Sep 1996 11:19:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from terry@localhost) by phaeton.artisoft.com (8.6.11/8.6.9) id LAA07211; Thu, 12 Sep 1996 11:16:59 -0700
From: Terry Lambert <terry@lambert.org>
Message-Id: <199609121816.LAA07211@phaeton.artisoft.com>
Subject: Re: OpenBSD <-> FreeBSD
To: jkh@time.cdrom.com (Jordan K. Hubbard)
Date: Thu, 12 Sep 1996 11:16:59 -0700 (MST)
Cc: graphix@iastate.edu, hackers@freebsd.org
In-Reply-To: <467.842508770@time.cdrom.com> from "Jordan K. Hubbard" at Sep 11, 96 11:12:50 pm
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

> >   Is there anyone tracking the changes that are made to the 4.4 source
> > in NetBSD/OpenBSD and incorporating the changes into the FreeBSD tree on
> > a regular basis?  If not, what is the common feeling of if this would be
> 
> No, and we really wish there were more people willing to do that!
> It's one of our #1 wish-list items, since we're essentially throwing
> away free fixes and enhancements otherwise.

Just a note: OpenBSD is not the only source of fixes being discarded.
Hint: have you integrated the patches I sent you to add remote system
semantics for flock for support of NFS server locking yet?


					Terry Lambert
					terry@lambert.org
---
Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present
or previous employers.