From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 1 04:54:13 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D3AF16A4DD for ; Fri, 1 Sep 2006 04:54:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dougb@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mail2.fluidhosting.com (mx23.fluidhosting.com [204.14.89.6]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D632043D49 for ; Fri, 1 Sep 2006 04:54:12 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dougb@FreeBSD.org) Received: (qmail 25107 invoked by uid 399); 1 Sep 2006 04:54:12 -0000 Received: from localhost (HELO ?192.168.0.10?) (dougb@dougbarton.us@127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 1 Sep 2006 04:54:12 -0000 Message-ID: <44F7BCF4.9080804@FreeBSD.org> Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2006 21:54:12 -0700 From: Doug Barton Organization: http://www.FreeBSD.org/ User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.5 (Windows/20060719) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Dirk Meyer References: <44F4E40C.7000101@elischer.org> <44E9582C.2010400@rsu.ru> <20060825220033.GC16768@turion.vk2pj.dyndns.org> <20060826055402.W43127@fledge.watson.org> <200608291627.32524.jhb@freebsd.org> <44F4E40C.7000101@elischer.org> <44F5534C.5070207@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.0.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [HEADS UP]: OpenLDAP+nss_ldap+nss_modules separated patch and more (SoC) X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Sep 2006 04:54:13 -0000 Dirk Meyer wrote: > OpenLDAP is not the only LDAP software, > there are much more leighweight implementations around. That's a very interesting statement. What would be slightly more useful are references to these other implementations, preferably with some insight into their licensing terms. I think the consensus is pretty heavily on the side of not adding any more new GPL software, for example. Doug -- This .signature sanitized for your protection