Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2008 15:41:04 +0200 From: Matthias Apitz <matthias.apitz@oclc.org> To: Peter Harrison <peter.piggybox@virgin.net> Cc: Mark Moellering <mark@msen.com>, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Problem with gio-fam-backend, portupgrade failing... Message-ID: <20080408134104.GA9259@rebelion.Sisis.de> In-Reply-To: <20080407210602.GA2949@laptop.piggybox> References: <20080407195412.GA89428@desktop.piggybox> <200804071635.06374.mark@msen.com> <20080407210602.GA2949@laptop.piggybox>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
El día Monday, April 07, 2008 a las 10:06:02PM +0100, Peter Harrison escribió: > > I have seen this before, if ( /devel/ ) gio-fam-backend needs a library that > > is outdated, it gives this sort of error. I know when I had the issue, it > > was that it needs glib 2.16 and I had 2.14. Thankfully it doesn't have too > > many dependancies so it isn't hard to check them all. > > > Right, I'll start looking through the gio-fam-backend dependencies and report back. > Thanks for the quick response. > > Peter Harrison. > > > > > > Mark Moellering I've installed last weekend a 7.0R, did portsnap fetch/extract and fired up my script to run in BATCH mode through the ~200 ports I wanted have installed on the box; when I came back late night and was hoping all went fine, some of the ports failed as well with gio-fam-backend; it took me some time to go to /usr/ports/devel/glib20, deinstall and install it fresh which changed it from glib-2.14.2 to 2.16.x (don't know the x from the top of my head now); after this all was fine again; really, I did not understand how this was possible after portsnap fetch/extract on a real new system, just installed from boot CD; matthias -- Matthias Apitz Manager Technical Support - OCLC GmbH Gruenwalder Weg 28g - 82041 Oberhaching - Germany t +49-89-61308 351 - f +49-89-61308 399 - m +49-170-4527211 e <matthias.apitz@oclc.org> - w http://www.oclc.org/ http://www.UnixArea.de/ b http://gurucubano.blogspot.com/ Don't top-post, read RFC1855 http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc1855.html A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is it such a bad thing? A: Top-posting. Q: What is the most annoying thing on Usenet and in e-mail?
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20080408134104.GA9259>