From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 14 16:04:39 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 749C116A417 for ; Fri, 14 Dec 2007 16:04:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from edt1023@ms17.hinet.net) Received: from msr26.hinet.net (msr26.hinet.net [168.95.4.126]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E501713C4CC for ; Fri, 14 Dec 2007 16:04:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from edt1023@ms17.hinet.net) Received: from ms17.hinet.net (218-169-137-181.dynamic.hinet.net [218.169.137.181]) by msr26.hinet.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id AAA27009; Sat, 15 Dec 2007 00:04:27 +0800 (CST) Received: by ms17.hinet.net (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Sat, 15 Dec 2007 00:01:38 +0800 Date: Sat, 15 Dec 2007 00:01:38 +0800 From: "Edward G.J. Lee" To: Matthew Seaman Message-ID: <20071214160138.GA41608@lgj.amnesia.net> References: <20071214134356.GA24368@lgj.amnesia.net> <47628FA8.7010100@infracaninophile.co.uk> <20071214143033.GA24844@lgj.amnesia.net> <4762A0F3.2030605@infracaninophile.co.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4762A0F3.2030605@infracaninophile.co.uk> Organization: GNU/Linux/*BSD Dreamer Club User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) Cc: freebsd-stable Subject: Re: Can't build graphviz X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2007 16:04:39 -0000 On Fri, Dec 14, 2007, Matthew Seaman wrote: > > Edward G.J. Lee wrote: > > On Fri, Dec 14, 2007, Matthew Seaman wrote: > > > >> You need to: > >> > >> make rmconfig > >> > >> and then try again. > > > > Thanks. > > > > But how do I know when I need `make rmconfig'? > > Generally when someone tells you it's a good idea on one of the mailing > lists.... It isn't necessary in normal operation -- there's just some > unfortunate interaction between bsd.gnome.mk and the graphviz makefile > that was introduced with a recent update to bsd.gnome.mk. I see. Thanks for the explanation. > > If I use portupgrade to upgrade this port, it will fail too. > > portupgrade worked perfectly well for me after this fix. Sorry, i mean before the fix.:) Edward