From owner-freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 18 20:51:22 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 832AF106566B for ; Mon, 18 Jan 2010 20:51:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from marius@alchemy.franken.de) Received: from alchemy.franken.de (alchemy.franken.de [194.94.249.214]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE2C78FC19 for ; Mon, 18 Jan 2010 20:51:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from alchemy.franken.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by alchemy.franken.de (8.14.3/8.14.3/ALCHEMY.FRANKEN.DE) with ESMTP id o0IKpJKw003879; Mon, 18 Jan 2010 21:51:19 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from marius@alchemy.franken.de) Received: (from marius@localhost) by alchemy.franken.de (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id o0IKpJO7003878; Mon, 18 Jan 2010 21:51:19 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from marius) Date: Mon, 18 Jan 2010 21:51:19 +0100 From: Marius Strobl To: Pyun YongHyeon Message-ID: <20100118205119.GQ18141@alchemy.franken.de> References: <0334FB50-D299-4723-A36A-0228EC062D34@ameri.ca> <20100110162033.GA79724@alchemy.franken.de> <20100118000641.GD1132@michelle.cdnetworks.com> <20100118194524.GN18141@alchemy.franken.de> <20100118204056.GD1336@michelle.cdnetworks.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20100118204056.GD1336@michelle.cdnetworks.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i Cc: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: smbfs X-BeenThere: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the Sparc List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 18 Jan 2010 20:51:22 -0000 On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 12:40:56PM -0800, Pyun YongHyeon wrote: > On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 08:45:24PM +0100, Marius Strobl wrote: > > On Sun, Jan 17, 2010 at 04:06:41PM -0800, Pyun YongHyeon wrote: > > > On Sun, Jan 10, 2010 at 05:20:33PM +0100, Marius Strobl wrote: > > > > On Fri, Jan 08, 2010 at 08:49:30AM -0500, brad dreisbach wrote: > > > > > what is the status of smbfs support in the sparc64 port? > > > > > > > > AFAICT it's still unchanged from last Februrary: > > > > http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-sparc64/2009-February/006189.html > > > > It still would be interesting to know how far the kernel part > > > > actually gets these days on sparc64. > > > > > > > > > > >From my very limited testing, it seems to work. Since smbfs related > > > libraries and kernel module are not installed by default you may > > > have to use attached patch and rebuild all or manually > > > build/install required files. > > > > > > Marius, since other strict alignment architectures like ia64 or > > > powerpc enabled smbfs, I guess it's ok to enable smbfs on sparc64. > > > What's your opinion? > > > > > > The attached patch also fixes an endian bug of smbutil(1). > > > > The patch looks good but I'd really would prefer someone to > > actually test it on sparc64 before enabling it as no other > > architecture supported by FreeBSD is LP64 big-endian and one > > can create bugs that are hidden on any other combination. > > > > I did test with/without authentication and can successfully copy > sys directory to/from Windows box over smbfs. Of course that test > may not exercise all possible code path but it seems we can request > more wider testing for smbfs on sparc64. Oh, sorry, I overread that you actually had tested it, so feel free to commit it when you feel confident. Marius