From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Sat Oct 12 09:33:58 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01C69150229 for ; Sat, 12 Oct 2019 09:33:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nicolas-ml@deffayet.com) Received: from smtp.novso.com (smtp1.novso.com [193.189.104.85]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.novso.com", Issuer "Sectigo RSA Domain Validation Secure Server CA" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46r0504Jlgz3Hyt for ; Sat, 12 Oct 2019 09:33:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nicolas-ml@deffayet.com) Message-ID: <1570872297.8425.1.camel@deffayet.com> Subject: Re: FRR on FreeBSD 12 - problems with OSPFv3 From: Nicolas DEFFAYET To: BulkMailForRudy , "Rodney W. Grimes" Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Date: Sat, 12 Oct 2019 11:24:57 +0200 In-Reply-To: References: <201910112112.x9BLCHJ7092447@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.22.6-1+deb9u2 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 46r0504Jlgz3Hyt X-Spamd-Bar: -- X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-2.50 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-0.997,0]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[deffayet.com:s=dkim]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:193.189.104.0/23]; MV_CASE(0.50)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[deffayet.com:+]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[deffayet.com,quarantine]; RCVD_COUNT_ZERO(0.00)[0]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; IP_SCORE(-0.00)[country: FR(-0.00)]; ASN(0.00)[asn:25358, ipnet:193.189.104.0/23, country:FR]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[] X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 12 Oct 2019 09:33:58 -0000 On Fri, 2019-10-11 at 16:14 -0700, BulkMailForRudy wrote: Hello, > Thanks for the questions, good for me to think about it some more.   > Short response: > >   I don't think it is the FRR config, but the routes received that > are  > crashing it or ospf6d has some other issue. FRR 7.1, the last release have a lot of ospf6d issues making it very unreliable. The only way to have reliable ospf6d is to keep quagga unfortunately. I have troubles in routes exchanges with ospf6d but never get daemon crash. On my loopback, I have an IPv4 address with /32 netmask and an IPv6 address with /64 netmask. If your configuration work fine with Quagga, and you add a router-id statement at the root of configuration (FRR have moved router-id statement outside of 'router ospf6' statement), it should work with FRR. If it didn't works, open a bug: https://github.com/FRRouting/frr/issues -- Nicolas DEFFAYET