Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2024 19:34:18 +0000 (UTC) From: "barney_cordoba@yahoo.com" <barney_cordoba@yahoo.com> To: FreeBSD Hackers <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org> Subject: Callout inprecision Message-ID: <1807649627.1646099.1709062458448@mail.yahoo.com> References: <1807649627.1646099.1709062458448.ref@mail.yahoo.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
------=_Part_1646098_116998073.1709062458447 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Testing callout precision, I'm getting consistent 5-6% error no matter whic= h of the fancy flags and precision settings used. =C2=A0Hardware clock, sof= t clock, =C2=A0on idle cpus. absolute binary time. Same results. Anyone ever done any testing on these functions or were they just accepted = on faith? 'I expect a bit of flutter but not as much as I'm seeing.=C2=A0 ------=_Part_1646098_116998073.1709062458447 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit <html><head></head><body><div class="yahoo-style-wrap" style="font-family:Helvetica Neue, Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif;font-size:16px;"><div dir="ltr" data-setdir="false">Testing callout precision, I'm getting consistent 5-6% error no matter which of the fancy flags and precision settings used. Hardware clock, soft clock, on idle cpus. absolute binary time. Same results.</div><div dir="ltr" data-setdir="false"><br></div><div dir="ltr" data-setdir="false">Anyone ever done any testing on these functions or were they just accepted on faith? 'I expect a bit of flutter but not as much as I'm seeing. </div></div></body></html> ------=_Part_1646098_116998073.1709062458447--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1807649627.1646099.1709062458448>