Date: Sat, 12 Jan 2008 22:21:31 -0600 From: linimon@lonesome.com (Mark Linimon) To: Igor Mozolevsky <igor@hybrid-lab.co.uk> Cc: Kostik Belousov <kostikbel@gmail.com>, Dominic Fandrey <kamikaze@bsdforen.de>, freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Improving the handling of PR:s Message-ID: <20080113042131.GD14666@soaustin.net> In-Reply-To: <a2b6592c0801120742y71d84965ldafca1db678f702a@mail.gmail.com> References: <478556AD.6090400@bsdforen.de> <20080110003524.GB5188@soaustin.net> <200801111935.50821.peter.schuller@infidyne.com> <478887B4.9030906@bsdforen.de> <20080112152303.GV57756@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> <a2b6592c0801120742y71d84965ldafca1db678f702a@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, Jan 12, 2008 at 03:42:48PM +0000, Igor Mozolevsky wrote: > Another alternative is to have a boolean flag on the PR so that the > author can indicate that it's a patch and have the gnats mail a > separate list of uncommitted patches separately to other open PRs? See: http://docs.freebsd.org/cgi/getmsg.cgi?fetch=423741+0+archive/2007/freebsd-bugs/20071231.freebsd-bugs There's also the list of PRs sorted by tag: http://docs.freebsd.org/cgi/getmsg.cgi?fetch=544200+0+archive/2007/freebsd-bugs/20071231.freebsd-bugs As the author of both of these, I will cheerfully agree that they are insufficient for our needs. I created them as an experiment. mcl
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20080113042131.GD14666>