Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 05 Apr 2007 09:18:39 +0900 (JST)
From:      KIMURA Yasuhiro <yasu@utahime.org>
To:        freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Cc:        stas@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: Incorrect version comparison
Message-ID:  <20070405.091839.118426469.yasu@utahime.org>
In-Reply-To: <20070404193443.GA63066@xor.obsecurity.org>
References:  <C95CD98B-6DA5-4062-900B-D192902BC215@student.chalmers.se> <20070404193443.GA63066@xor.obsecurity.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
From: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org>
Subject: Re: Incorrect version comparison
Date: Wed, 4 Apr 2007 15:34:43 -0400

> > My daily cronscript reported this morning that there was a new  
> > version of ruby+pthreads:
> > ruby+pthreads-1.8.5.12,1            <   needs updating (index has  
> > 1.8.6,1)
> > 
> > However, when I was about to upgrade it, it didn't appear in the list  
> > of outdated ports. Instead I saw this output from portversion:
> > ruby+pthreads-1.8.5.12,1    >  succeeds port (port has 1.8.6)
> > 
> > It appears that (1.8.6,1) has been replaced by (1.8.6) during the day  
> > and this has inaccurately taged my (1.8.5)-installation as newer than  
> > the one in ports. What might be the cause of this?
> 
> Someone mistakenly dropped the portepoch from the port?

I sent PR of this problem (ports/111209) but idea of fixing seems
wrong (or does not work as is expected).

---
KIMURA Yasuhiro



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20070405.091839.118426469.yasu>